loneliness + alienation + fear + despair + self-worth ÷ mockery ÷ condemnation ÷ misunderstanding x guilt x shame x failure x judgment n=y where y=hope and n=folly, love=lies, life=death, self=dark side
The more I learn in my Educational Psychology class about what "learning disabilities", "mental retardation" and the like are, the more I want to punch people. Why can't your kid pay attention? He has attention deficit disorder. Why can't your kid read? He has dyslexia (which basically translates to "can't read disease".) I'm not saying there aren't genuine developmental disorders out there, but to slap a Latin or otherwise sciency name on a statistical construct and then tell the parent it's treatable with medicine is the work of Satan.
So I really didn't pay all that much attention to E3 last week, aside from the PS3 madness (I was considering buying one. Then I found out my PS2 is only worth $30 on trade-in.) Can't use the Wii, can't justify the cost of a PS3 or 360 when I don't have an HDTV, and won't be able to afford a game machine if I buy one (which would have to be a bottom-rung Vizio TV). So I kind of shrugged and caught what I thought were the high points, and pondered the fact that in a year I'd have nothing but obsolete gaming options plus my DS.
Then yesterday, just kind of poking around the Series of Tubes, I found something that I'd completely missed out on, what with getting much of my E3 info from the videogames sub-folder of a popular pro-wrestling and MMA forum and all. Sony announced a serious redesign for the PSP. It's lighter, may or may not have better battery life, and will definitely have the coolest ability ever--you can hook it up to any progressive-scan monitor (which lets my old TV out, but I should be able to use the video-in on my PC) and play with minimal loss of quality (Ars Technica said "the video quality was impressively clear even when blown up to epic proportions on Sony's main stage.") So yeah, I'll stop grumpling about Captain Marvel and buy a PSP.
I wonder if there are still UMD copies of Tron floating around the retail channels; it's pretty much the only movie I'd ever want to buy for it.
"To have any sympathy for a killer is an insult to their victims!"
--Steve Ditko's Mr. A
So yeah, it's pretty obvious to anyone who knows me what inspired, at least in part, this rambling. I'd like to say before we begin that this isn't an attempt to justify or exonerate someone I won't be naming in the post for the horrible crime I won't describe; rather all the talk of steroids and concussions and things has tied in with things I've thought about on-and-off since I saw A Clockwork Orange for the first time about fourteen years ago. (The last time I really stopped to ponder it was David Cross's "executing the retarded" rant on his 2003 album, Shut Up You Fucking Baby). It didn't help that I've been reading Ditko's late-60s Charlton work and rewatching the Cadmus episodes of JLU of late, leading me to ponder Objectivism (I'm far too convinced of the existence of God to ever truly be a Randroid, but a lot of her writings make sense to me in a purely nuts-and-bolts way; reading Ditko and listening to Rush probably contributes to this). Incidentally, Bill Reed of Comics Should Be Good has been doing a "Ditko Week" as part of his 365 Reasons to Love Comics series, which reminded me of the Mr. A quote above (which I first saw in 2005).
So my basic question is, in a purely mortal sense (since any religion will have its own rules--Christianity teaches forgiveness is there for any who ask in earnest for it and accept Jesus as their savior, while Islam is much more strict on what is or isn't forgivable and when), is there a line beyond which criminals become victims of biology? Not "nature vs. nurture," but a point where specific abnormalities in the brain render one incapable of doing the right thing or resisting a particular temptation. The courts say that if they're too deranged or mentally handicapped to understand the consequences of their actions, a murderer or rapist cannot be held truly responsible (though they're still kept well away from "normal" people). If you can point to a specific formation caused by head trauma, the entry of unwanted chemicals into the body, or a cancerous growth, can you honestly say "The man who committed this horrible act is not the man I knew" and be truthful in a more literal sense than it's usually meant? Or do we all have within us the power to resist any temptation on our own, meaning that to yield to these neurological abnormalities is a moral failing and we're culpable for the proverbial whispers they put into our ears?
I don't really have an answer, obviously, and nor am I looking for one from anyone else. It's just the kind of question I ask myself sometimes, especially when someone else says "I don't care what was wrong with his brain, he's a piece of crap for doing that and should go to hell."
So about six weeks ago, I was looking at the list of random Hasbro tie-ins for the Transformers movie. Nerf and Super Soaker guns, Mr. Potato Head (I love Transformers way more than I like Star Wars, but Optimash Prime is no Darth Tater) and the like. It got me thinking about how many re-brands of classic MB/PB board games have been done in the past few years, even discounting Monopoly. Operation alone has had Shrek, Simpsons and Spider-Man versions, there's Lord of the Rings Risk and I think Axis and Allies, and the list goes on. I lamented to my friends that my favorite of the second-tier board games, Stratego, was just MADE for a Transformers branding but was hard enough to find even in its original form that there was no chance.